Project #2 – Amphibex

For 5 years, Audubon owned and operated a mini-dredge on its sanctuary property to build marsh under Coastal Use Permit #P20090649 (CUP).  Through a NFWF grant in 2015, we were presented with a unique opportunity to demonstrate the use of another small dredge, the Amphibex 400 (Figure 1) owned by Bertucci Construction Co., to create marsh in the same permitted area. The Amphibex is only 13 feet longer than our mini-dredge but can move 10 times more material in the same amount of time as the Audubon mini-dredge. A new Audubon-owned, GPS-linked fathometer system allows us to monitor and document the refill rate of the borrow area.

Figure 1. The Amphibex 400 was utilized at the Paul J. Rainey Wildlife Sanctuary to fill the west end of our permitted pond using material dredged from the adjacent location canal.

In 2009, Audubon commissioned a dredge from a local construction company that could be used by landowners, putting cost-effective restoration capabilities into their hands. Unlike larger dredge designs, it was constructed as a simple tool and has limited utility in terms of creating substantial acreage. This was our mini-dredge, the “John James.”

The project location is within the Audubon Paul J. Rainey Wildlife Sanctuary in Vermilion Parish, southwest Louisiana (Figure 2). A 16-acre pond that was created when Hurricane Ike removed marsh next to a dead-end oil & gas location canal was selected and permitted for dredge and fill with a small dredge.

Between 2010 and 2013, the John James managed to fill one acre of open water. This left 15 acres of calculated fill in the existing CUP, and a permit extension to 2017 was obtained for further work in the same dredge-and-fill footprints.

Figure 2. Location of the study area (Figure 2) within the Audubon Paul J. Rainey Refuge in southwest Louisiana.

With the greater capability of the Amphibex 400, instead of the marsh terraces proposed in the permit extension documents, the Amphibex 400 proposed to work for 30 days to fill at least 5-10 acres of the permitted pond with slurry, allowing overflow to increase the marsh integrity of the area.  The actual result was 15 acres filled with a thick slurry in 23 days, working sometimes 24 hours/day. High water at the time of material transport allowed higher resultant stacking of fine material, as well as loss or settlement through the surrounding marsh (Figure 3).

Reduction of wind fetch and slower water flows, reduction of edge erosion, and promotion of vegetative growth (both marsh and submerged aquatics) was expected in the remaining pond. The new marsh will also benefit various species of marsh birds of conservation concern, as well as other wildlife and estuarine species. Changes in water clarity, vegetation species diversity, expansion in the remaining pond, persistence of the created marsh and refill rate of the borrow area will be monitored.

The average water depth of the original pond to marsh level was approximately 10-12 inches. Material was pumped to a target of +3 to +12 inches above surrounding marsh substrate and was partially contained using existing marsh landscape and bagasse/hay bags pinned between 2x4s that will naturally degrade and decompose over time. Overflow of effluent into the surrounding marsh was expected, filling in depressions and sub-aqueous channels and acting as a fertilizing agent to enhance the health of that marsh.

Because of the fine-grained nature of the fill material, stacking above water level was temporary as it slowly spread by its own weight to self-level. An airboat was used during the pumping process to help spread the more cohesive material away from the outfall and into areas it would not naturally flow. Natural drainage developed as expected and was augmented by the movement of resident alligators. Therefore, no reworking of material was needed as the site matured and it was allowed to naturalize.

Vegetative plantings had been planned, but the natural colonization seemed to be more than adequate and it was not worth disturbing the soft, shallow substrate to use mechanical means to plant more vegetation.

Figure 3. The Amphibex 400 filled the remaining 15 acres of the permitted pond with dense slurry during a high water event that allowed stacking well above marsh level between October 9 and October 23, 2015.

The pond bathymetry and topography was surveyed before fill is initiated, at two years after dredging was completed to allow for settlement and vegetative growth, and then periodically for at least 3 years. To document plant succession, we will catalog plant species composition and measure vegetative growth by aerial photography collected by drone or Google imagery.

The canal bathymetry is being monitored to establish a refill rate for possible reuse in the future. 24,300 cubic yards were removed and transferred to the fill area, and as of July 2017, 4,337 cubic yards have accumulated. If this rate is linear, it suggests the same canal could be used again for borrow in 8 years.

Comparing data between fill areas in the same pond by two different dredges will allow us to provide guidelines for use of this novel restoration technique. A cost and logistic comparison to Audubon’s mini-dredge will be included in Audubon’s Guidance for Utilizing Small Dredge Technology for Restoration of Marsh on Private Properties (2017). This project further demonstrates the capabilities of small dredge technology.


Leave a Reply